Details



NEURAL TUBE DEFECT: EPIDEMIOLOGIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC IMPLICATION

Kavitha Sargunam, Dr. Renu Boora

91-98

Vol. 3, Jan-Jun, 2016

Date of Submission: 2016-02-28 Date of Acceptance: 2016-03-27 Date of Publication: 2016-04-14

Abstract

Congenital abnormalities can develop at any time after the first month of pregnancy. From conception to birth, the embryo, and the fetus have to adapt, at a molecular and transcriptional level, to various changes in their cellular mileau . At conception, this environment depends on the micronutritional status of maternal and paternal germ cells and after conception on maternal nutritional status, metabolism, and lifestyle. Neural tube defect (NTD) is one of the commonest malformations with worldwide prevalence of 1-3/1000 live births. They are caused by failure of neural tube to close during neurulation in 21-28 embryonic days. The most common types of NTD are anencephaly and spina bifida, which are caused by failure of closure of cranial pore and spinal part of neural tube, respectively. Unfortunately the number of studies on this aspect is too scanty in our state. Therefore the present research work has been undertaken in the Department of Anatomy, M.K.C.G. Medical College, Berhampur during the period 2011-2013 with the help of Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Radiodiagnosis to study the Neural tube defect aiming to know the prevalence and demographic status , to reduce maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality by selected obstetrical management.

References

  1. Abdi Rad I., H.R.Farrokh-Islamlou, M. Khoshkalam: Neural Tube Defects Prevalence In A Hospital-Based Study In Urmia; Iran J Child Neurology June 2008
  2. Feuchtbaum LB, Currier RJ, Riggle S, Roberson M, Lorey FW, Cunningham GC. Neural tube defect prevalence in California (1990- 1994): eliciting patterns by type of defect and maternal race/ethnicity. Genet Test 1999; 3 (3): 265-272
  3. Isada, Nelson B.; Qureshi, Faisal; Jacques, Suzanne M.; Holzgreve, Wolfgang; Tout, Mary Jo; Johnson, Mark P.; Evans, Mark I. (1993). 'Meroanencephaly: Pathology and Prenatal Diagnosis'. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy8 (6): 428.
  4. Bernard Jean-Pierre , MD; Howard S. Cuckle, BA, MSc, DPhil; Julien J. Stirnemann, MD; Laurent J. Salomon, MD, PhD; Yves Ville, MD; Screening for fetalspina bifida by ultrasound examination in the first trimester of pregnancy using fetal biparietal diameter; 306.e1 American Journal of Obstetrics &Gynecology 2012.
  5. N N Dissanayake, S C Wickramasinghe2, D M W H Bandara3, Study on neural tube defects of neonates and folic acid awareness at a Teaching Hospital in Sri Lanka Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health, 2010; 39:11-16
  6. Mahadevan B, Bhat BV. Neural tube defects in Pondicherry. Indian J Pediatr 2005; 72: 557-559.
  7. Agarwal S S. Neural tube defect: a preventable congenital malformation. Indian Pediatr 1999; 36 : 643-648.
  8. Shaw GM, Nelson V, Olshan AFPaternal occupational group and risk of offspring with neural tube defects. PaediatrPerinatEpidemiol.2002 Oct;16(4):328-33
  9. Halwachs S., C. Lakoma, R. Gebhardt, I. Schäfer, P. Seibel, and W. Honscha, “Dioxin mediates downregulation of the reduced folate carrier transport activity via the arylhydrocarbon receptor signalling pathway,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 246, no. 1-2, pp. 100–106, 2010
  10. Hansen D. A., “Paternal environmental exposures and gene expression during spermatogenesis: research review to research framework,” Birth Defects Research Part C, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 155–163, 2008.
  11. Schultz R., J. Suominen, T. Värre et al., “Expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor and aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator messenger ribonucleic acids and proteins in rat and human testis,” Endocrinology, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 767–776, 2003.
  12. Sharada B. Menasinkai; A Study of Neural tube defects, J. Anat. Soc. India 59(2) 162-167 (2010).
  13. Golalipour MJ, Najafi L.,Keshtkar AA : Prevalence of anencephaly in gorgan, Northern Iran.Arch Iran Med 2010;13:34-7
  14. Vieira AR, Castillo Taucher S. Maternal age and neural tube defects: evidence for a greater effect in spina bifida than in anencephaly.Rev Med Chil. 2005 Jan;133(1):62-70. Epub 2005 Mar 10
  15. Orv Hetil.Joó JG, Beke A, Szigeti Z, Csaba A, Mezei G, Tóth-Pál E, Papp Z, Papp C.; Craniospinal malformations in a twelve-year fetopathological study; the efficiency of ultrasonography in view of fetopathological investigations. 2008 Jan 6; 149(1):23-7.
Download PDF
Back